Showing posts with label Arguments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arguments. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

outside courthouse Dec 6, 2010 - arguments on gay marriage

2 activists for prop 8 talk about the family being the center of our society while a gay man challenge them. (12-06) 18:10 PST SAN FRANCISCO -- The federal appeals court in the Proposition 8 case hinted Monday at a ruling that would allow gays and lesbians to marry in California while leaving other states' laws intact - a restrained approach seemingly designed to appeal to the US Supreme Court. Lawyers challenging the 2008 initiative urged the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco to uphold a federal judge's ruling in August that Prop. 8 violated the US Constitution because its definition of marriage as the union of a man and a woman discriminated on the basis of gender and sexual orientation. But in a nationally televised, 2 1/2-hour hearing, the three-judge appellate panel seemed intent on framing the case more narrowly before it reaches the Supreme Court. Judges Michael Hawkins and Stephen Reinhardt compared the case to a 1996 Supreme Court ruling overturning a Colorado initiative that prohibited local governments from enacting civil rights laws protecting gays and lesbians. Without deciding whether the Constitution banned all anti-gay discrimination, the high court said stripping rights from a minority group, for no apparent reason other than moral disapproval, was unconstitutional. What's different? Hawkins noted that California voters approved Prop. 8 six months after the state Supreme Court ruled that gays and lesbians had the right to marry. "How is ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfwxCYZVfkE&hl=en

Friends Link : cheap lg lcd tv review

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Establishment of Religion Clause Oral Arguments, Part 2

Establishment of Religion Clause Oral Arguments, Part 2 - US Court of Appeals - 202212-2-DVD - 2007-12-04 - The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco heard oral arguments in two cases on the use of God-related language. In the second case, the Court reviewed a district court's ruling in Newdow v. Carey in which the court permanently prohibited a local school district from leading students in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Sacramento physician, aethist, and lawyer Michael Newdow had argued that public schools using the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and was an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. He argued that while reciting the pledge is voluntary, it becomes unconstitutional when students who do not believe in God are forced to hear it. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see www.c-spanvideo.org



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jum04fVa-JA&hl=en

Tags : cheap lg lcd tv review